主體共建、行動(dòng)共治、利益共享：城市社區(qū)公共體育服務(wù)治理共同體構(gòu)建研究
打開文本圖片集
Abstract：Building a governance community for public sportsservices in urban communities is not onlyan inevitable requirement to meet the people's growing needs forabeter life，butalsoan inherent requirementfor building ahigher -level public service system for national fitness.Moreover，it isaninevitable choice to promote the modernization the sports governance system and governance capacity.By employing methods such as literature review and field investigation and based on clarifying theconcept the governance community public sportsservices in urban communities，this paper buildsananalytical framework "subject-action-interest"，and deeply explores the practical predicaments and practical paths constructing the governance community public sports services in urban communities.The research finds that the governance community public sports services in urban communities includes thesubject dimension"sharedresponsibilitybyall"，theaction dimension "fulfiled dutybyall"，and the benefit dimension "shared benefits for all".The construction agovernance community for public sports services inurban communities is confronted with therealisticpredicament the absence the main body community members，disorderlyactions and unbalanced interests.Based on this，a practical path is proposed：Based on theco-construction the main body，ensurethat the governance public sports services inurban communities is "everyone'sresponsibility"；Withco-governance through action asthecore，ensure that everyone fulfllstheir responsibilities in the governance public sportsservices inurban communities；With the guarantee shared benefits， ensure that the governance public sports services in urban communities is accessible to all.
Key words： public sportsservices；sports governance；governance community；modernization the governance system and governance capacity； national fitness；urban community； new development stage
社會(huì)治理范式的歷史演進(jìn)表明，黨和國家通過深刻變革社會(huì)權(quán)利關(guān)系、持續(xù)創(chuàng)新社會(huì)治理體系，實(shí)現(xiàn)了從“管理”向“治理”的范式轉(zhuǎn)型，并在治理框架下推動(dòng)從“多元合作”向“治理共同體”的理念深化[1]。（剩余15020字）