不同修復(fù)材料的牙齒修復(fù)效果比較

打開文本圖片集

【摘 要】目的 比較三種不同修復(fù)材料的牙齒修復(fù)效果。方法 選取2020年1月-2021年11月于我院行口腔修復(fù)的120例患者為研究對象，隨機(jī)分為A組、B組、C組，每組40例。A組使用陶瓷材料進(jìn)行修復(fù)，B組使用樹脂材料進(jìn)行修復(fù)，C組使用金屬材料進(jìn)行修復(fù)，比較三組修復(fù)成功率及不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率。結(jié)果 三組修復(fù)后6、12個月的修復(fù)成功率比較，差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P>0.05）；A組不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率為7.50%，低于B組的40.00%與C組的22.50%，差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P

【關(guān)鍵詞】口腔修復(fù)；抗摩擦性能；牙齒修復(fù)；樹脂材料；金屬材料；陶瓷材料

中圖分類號：R783.1 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼：A 文章編號：1004-4949（2023）06-0098-04

Comparison of Tooth Repair Effects of Different Repair Materials

LI Yun-meng， DU Qing-bo

（Shijiazhuang Medical College， Shijiazhuang 050000， Hebei， China）

【Abstract】Objective To compare the effects of three different dental restoration materials. Methods A total of 120 patients who underwent oral repair in our hospital from January 2020 to November 2021 were randomly divided into group A， group B and group C， with 40 cases in each group. Group A was repaired with ceramic materials， group B was repaired with resin materials， and group C was repaired with metal materials. The success rate of repair and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared among the three groups. Results There was no significant difference in the success rate of repair between the three groups at 6 and 12 months after repair （P>0.05）. The incidence of adverse reactions in group A was 7.50%， which was lower than 40.00% in group B and 22.50% in group C， the difference was statistically significant （P

【Key words】Oral repair； Friction resistance； Tooth repair； Resin material； Metal materials； Ceramic materials

隨著年齡增長，機(jī)體各項(xiàng)機(jī)能在不斷衰退，容易出現(xiàn)牙齒松動、牙齒磨損、牙齒脫落等口腔問題，均會對患者的生活質(zhì)量與身體健康產(chǎn)生不利影響[1]。（剩余6901字）