胎頭吸引術(shù)與產(chǎn)鉗術(shù)在助產(chǎn)中的應(yīng)用比較

打開文本圖片集

【摘要】目的：比較胎頭吸引術(shù)與產(chǎn)鉗術(shù)的助產(chǎn)效果；方法：回顧性分析2017年10月—2021年9月在我院行陰道手術(shù)助產(chǎn)的單胎產(chǎn)婦96例。其中行胎頭吸引術(shù)的53例，稱為胎頭吸引術(shù)組；行產(chǎn)鉗術(shù)的43例，稱為產(chǎn)鉗術(shù)組。結(jié)果：胎頭吸引術(shù)組和產(chǎn)鉗術(shù)組助產(chǎn)成功率接近，分別為92.45%和95.35%（P>0.05）；胎頭吸引術(shù)組助產(chǎn)時長長于產(chǎn)鉗術(shù)組（P

【關(guān)鍵詞】胎頭吸引術(shù)；產(chǎn)鉗術(shù)；助產(chǎn)

Comparison of the application of fetal head aspiration and forceps in assisted delivery

TANG Li Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology， Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning Service Center， Pujiang County， Chengdu， Sichuan 611630， China

【Abstract】Objective：Comparison of the effects of fetal head aspiration and forceps.Methods：A retrospective analysis of 96 singleton parturients who underwent vaginal surgery to assist delivery in our hospital from October 2017 to September 2021.Among them，53 cases underwent fetal head aspiration were called the fetal head aspiration group；43 cases underwent forceps were called the forceps group. Results：The success rate of assisted delivery in the fetal head aspiration group and the forceps group was similar， respectively， 92.45% and 95.35%（P>0.05）； The length of midwifery in the fetal head aspiration group was longer than that in the forceps group（P

【Key words】Fetal head suction； Forceps； Midwifery

陰道助產(chǎn)手術(shù)是減少非必要剖宮產(chǎn)重要的手段之一，且較剖宮產(chǎn)操作更簡單、時間更短[1]，陰道助產(chǎn)手術(shù)包括胎頭吸引術(shù)與產(chǎn)鉗術(shù)兩種，這兩種陰道助產(chǎn)技術(shù)各有優(yōu)缺點，需根據(jù)產(chǎn)婦實際情況和手術(shù)者經(jīng)驗判斷來選擇[2]。（剩余3537字）